3.1.3 · 35–55 minutes · investigate, calculate, discuss, review

What you will learn

  • Build a causal chain from operations to cash and value.
  • Distinguish association from a causal explanation.
  • Identify alternatives and missing links.

3.1 · The Investment Case

Check the evidence

Two lenses examine competing evidence and assumptions.

The Investment Case · the work you will do

  1. 1Check the evidence
  2. 2Build the opposing case
  3. 3Test what matters
  4. 4Reach a judgement

Before you begin

DailyCup raises menu prices 5% and unit transactions fall 3%. Does higher revenue mean the business became more valuable?

Record your first answer before continuing.

Video coming soon · about 3 minutes

Follow the Business Logic

Use the narration below while the recording is being made, then try the decisions in this lesson.

Read the full narration

Welcome to On Judgement. DailyCup raises menu prices 5% and unit transactions fall 3%. Does higher revenue mean the business became more valuable? Take a first view. You can change it when you have considered the evidence.

A useful argument links a business change to customers, prices, volumes and costs, then to profit, reinvestment and cash. Value also depends on the durability and risk of those cash flows and what is already reflected in price. Write every link rather than jumping from one favourable operating statistic to a buy recommendation. A diagram can reveal where the evidence runs out.

Revenue equals price times units for a single consistent product mix. A price rise and volume fall combine multiplicatively; simply subtracting percentages is an approximation. Profit also depends on variable contribution and fixed costs. First hold other factors constant to understand the arithmetic, then relax the assumptions. The controlled calculation is not a claim that the real world holds everything else fixed.

If revenue rises after a new loyalty scheme, seasonality, a nearby closure or a concurrent price change might explain part of the change. Comparing before and after alone does not isolate causality. Look for comparable locations, timing, customer cohorts and other changes. Evidence can strengthen a causal explanation without proving that one action caused every observed difference.

Higher profit can require more inventory, customer credit and capacity spending. A faster-growing business can consume cash. Ask whether the return on incremental investment justifies its funding and risk. Stakeholder effects also enter the mechanism: staffing, supplier terms and service quality can support or undermine repeat demand. Explain these effects in context rather than add a generic ethics paragraph.

Let's work through Price, units and contribution. Use the simplified DailyCup base: 100,000 transactions at £5, variable cost £3 per transaction, annual fixed costs £150,000. Raise price 5%, reduce units 3%, and initially hold unit cost and fixed costs unchanged. Pause here and try the calculation or reasoning before continuing.

Base revenue = £500,000; contribution = 100,000×(5−3) = £200,000; operating profit = £50,000. New price £5.25; units 97,000; revenue = 97,000×5.25 = £509,250. Revenue factor =1.05×.97=1.0185, or growth 1.85%. New contribution =97,000×(5.25−3)=£218,250; profit=£68,250 under the stated assumptions.

Profit rises here because unit cost and fixed costs were held constant. Customer retention, promotions, wage costs, capex and tax could change the wider conclusion.

Now try the choices in this lesson. If your answer changes, identify the reason. Identify alternatives and missing links. Use the case activities to put the idea into your own words, and return to the evidence when more than one conclusion is defensible.

Explain the mechanism

A useful argument links a business change to customers, prices, volumes and costs, then to profit, reinvestment and cash. Value also depends on the durability and risk of those cash flows and what is already reflected in price. Write every link rather than jumping from one favourable operating statistic to a buy recommendation. A diagram can reveal where the evidence runs out.

Check your understanding · choose one

New revenue is…

Correct. £5.25×97,000 = £509,250.

Reconsider this choice. £5.25×97,000 = £509,250. Try another answer.

Multiply connected changes

Revenue equals price times units for a single consistent product mix. A price rise and volume fall combine multiplicatively; simply subtracting percentages is an approximation. Profit also depends on variable contribution and fixed costs. First hold other factors constant to understand the arithmetic, then relax the assumptions. The controlled calculation is not a claim that the real world holds everything else fixed.

Check your understanding · choose one

Profit under the fixed assumptions is…

Correct. 97,000×£2.25−150,000 =68,250.

Reconsider this choice. 97,000×£2.25−150,000 =68,250. Try another answer.

Consider rival explanations

If revenue rises after a new loyalty scheme, seasonality, a nearby closure or a concurrent price change might explain part of the change. Comparing before and after alone does not isolate causality. Look for comparable locations, timing, customer cohorts and other changes. Evidence can strengthen a causal explanation without proving that one action caused every observed difference.

Check your understanding · choose one

Before/after association alone…

Correct. Consider other changes and suitable comparisons.

Reconsider this choice. Consider other changes and suitable comparisons. Try another answer.

Carry the logic into cash

Higher profit can require more inventory, customer credit and capacity spending. A faster-growing business can consume cash. Ask whether the return on incremental investment justifies its funding and risk. Stakeholder effects also enter the mechanism: staffing, supplier terms and service quality can support or undermine repeat demand. Explain these effects in context rather than add a generic ethics paragraph.

Check your understanding · choose one

More profit becomes investor value only after considering…

Correct. Carry the mechanism through the business and claim.

Reconsider this choice. Carry the mechanism through the business and claim. Try another answer.

Price, units and contribution

Use the simplified DailyCup base: 100,000 transactions at £5, variable cost £3 per transaction, annual fixed costs £150,000. Raise price 5%, reduce units 3%, and initially hold unit cost and fixed costs unchanged.

  1. Base revenue = £500,000; contribution = 100,000×(5−3) = £200,000; operating profit = £50,000.
  2. New price £5.25; units 97,000; revenue = 97,000×5.25 = £509,250.
  3. Revenue factor =1.05×.97=1.0185, or growth 1.85%.
  4. New contribution =97,000×(5.25−3)=£218,250; profit=£68,250 under the stated assumptions.

Profit rises here because unit cost and fixed costs were held constant. Customer retention, promotions, wage costs, capex and tax could change the wider conclusion.

Put it into practice

1. Draw the chain

Connect a price increase to value in six steps, marking one uncertain link.

Write your response in your workbook before opening feedback.

Compare with a model response

Price → paid demand/mix → contribution → operating profit → after-tax cash after reinvestment → conditional value. Identify evidence at each link and how competition could disrupt it.

2. Test another cause

Sales rise after a store refurbishment. Name two alternative explanations and a comparison that could help.

Write your response in your workbook before opening feedback.

Compare with a model response

Seasonality or a nearby competitor closure might matter. Compare appropriately similar periods/locations, transaction mix and realised prices, while acknowledging remaining differences.

3. Challenge the conclusion

Start with a choice · choose one

Revenue rises 1.85%. Why might value move by a different percentage?

Correct. Follow the mechanism through margins, reinvestment, cash and the claim being valued. Revenue growth alone does not fix value growth.

Reconsider this choice. Follow the mechanism through margins, reinvestment, cash and the claim being valued. Revenue growth alone does not fix value growth. Try another answer.

Repair “revenue rises 1.85%, therefore value rises 1.85%”.

Write your response in your workbook before opening feedback.

Compare with a model response

Revenue is not cash or value. Under the controlled example profit rises, but sustainability, reinvestment, risk and expectations still matter. No exact value change follows from the revenue percentage alone.

Jargon buster

Causal chain

A sequence explaining how one change could lead to another.

Contribution

Revenue less specified variable costs.

Confounder

Another factor affecting the apparent relationship.

Cohort

A defined group tracked over time.

Incremental

Additional to a specified baseline.

Cannibalisation

New activity displacing existing business rather than adding wholly new demand.

Knowledge check

Make each choice on the page. Feedback explains the reasoning. Use Try again after revisiting an idea.

Check your understanding · choose one

Price+5%, units−3% gives revenue growth…

Correct. 1.05×.97−1 = .0185.

Reconsider this choice. 1.05×.97−1 = .0185. Try another answer.

AQA connection and further reading

AQA 7138: AO 2 application, AO 3 analysis and AO 4 evaluation (4.2), with command-word practice (4.4). Case connections include 3.1.4 finance, 3.3.3 strategy and 3.3.4 uncertainty. These original investing tasks and rubrics are not official AQA questions or mark schemes.

AQA 7138 specification
Primary curriculum reference; links and original classroom rubrics are interpretive, not endorsement.

Take forward

Build a causal chain from operations to cash and value. Distinguish association from a causal explanation. Identify alternatives and missing links.