2.2.7 · 40–60 minutes · read, calculate, discuss, review
What you will learn
- Value distinct operations and reconcile consolidated earnings.
- Adjust for central costs and other claims.
- Separate segment valuation from a claim that breakup creates value.
2.2 · Valuation
Define the cash flow

Valuation · the work you will do
- 1Define the cash flow
- 2Make assumptions explicit
- 3Estimate a range
- 4Compare with price
Before you begin
Harbour makes equipment and services an installed customer base. Would selling the divisions separately necessarily make shareholders richer?
Write your first response before continuing.
Video coming soon · about 4 minutes
Sum of the Parts
Use the narration below while the recording is being made, then try the decisions in this lesson.
Read the full narration
Welcome to On Judgement. Harbour makes equipment and services an installed customer base. Would selling the divisions separately necessarily make shareholders richer? Take a first view. You can change it when you have considered the evidence.
A group can contain operations with different growth, margins, risks and capital needs. SOTP values those operations using methods suitable to each, then reconciles to the relevant group claim. It is not reserved for giant conglomerates. Revenue is not a substitute for profit when allocating a profit multiple, and internal transfers must not be counted as external group earnings twice.
Divisional values can overstate the group if recurring central costs are omitted. Deduct a justified value for those costs where they are not already included. Deal with debt, cash, pensions, minority claims and non-operating assets consistently. This exercise excludes additional claims and assumes a stated central-cost value. Do not capitalise central costs and also deduct the same costs again within the divisional estimates.
A group can trade below an analyst’s sum because of complexity, capital allocation concerns, costs, financing or simply different assumptions. An attractive standalone multiple is not a cash offer for the division. Separation may lose shared customer relationships, technology, purchasing scale or distribution. Compare the integrated strategy with credible alternatives rather than assume that a theoretical gap can be collected immediately.
SOTP can inform valuation while the business remains integrated. A separation proposal needs after-cost proceeds, tax, execution, funding and dis-synergies investigated. Directors’ duties are jurisdiction-specific and cannot be reduced here to a requirement to accept the largest headline estimate. This classroom committee assesses a business case, not legal compliance or a real transaction.
Let's work through Harbour’s two divisions · £m. Equipment divisional EBITDA is 28 and service EBITDA 16, both before central costs. Annual central expense is 2, so consolidated EBITDA is 42. Use invented multiples 5x and 6x respectively. Deduct a separately assumed £20m present value of central costs. Net debt is 20; shares 20m. Pause here and try the calculation or reasoning before continuing.
Equipment EV = 28 × 5 = 140; service EV = 16 × 6 = 96. Divisional EV sum = 236; after central costs = 236 − 20 = 216. Equity = 216 − 20 net debt = 196; value per share = 196/20 = £9.80. Using equipment 4.5–5.5x and service 5.5–6.5x with the same deductions gives £8.70–£10.90 per share.
The £20m central-cost deduction and £20m net-debt deduction are different items that happen to have the same amount. The estimate does not include actual separation proceeds or costs.
Now try the choices in this lesson. If your answer changes, identify the reason. Separate segment valuation from a claim that breakup creates value. Use the case activities to put the idea into your own words, and return to the evidence when more than one conclusion is defensible.
Different economics, separate estimates
A group can contain operations with different growth, margins, risks and capital needs. SOTP values those operations using methods suitable to each, then reconciles to the relevant group claim. It is not reserved for giant conglomerates. Revenue is not a substitute for profit when allocating a profit multiple, and internal transfers must not be counted as external group earnings twice.
Include the corporate centre
Divisional values can overstate the group if recurring central costs are omitted. Deduct a justified value for those costs where they are not already included. Deal with debt, cash, pensions, minority claims and non-operating assets consistently. This exercise excludes additional claims and assumes a stated central-cost value. Do not capitalise central costs and also deduct the same costs again within the divisional estimates.
A discount has several explanations
A group can trade below an analyst’s sum because of complexity, capital allocation concerns, costs, financing or simply different assumptions. An attractive standalone multiple is not a cash offer for the division. Separation may lose shared customer relationships, technology, purchasing scale or distribution. Compare the integrated strategy with credible alternatives rather than assume that a theoretical gap can be collected immediately.
Valuation is not a breakup instruction
SOTP can inform valuation while the business remains integrated. A separation proposal needs after-cost proceeds, tax, execution, funding and dis-synergies investigated. Directors’ duties are jurisdiction-specific and cannot be reduced here to a requirement to accept the largest headline estimate. This classroom committee assesses a business case, not legal compliance or a real transaction.
Harbour’s two divisions · £m
Equipment divisional EBITDA is 28 and service EBITDA 16, both before central costs. Annual central expense is 2, so consolidated EBITDA is 42. Use invented multiples 5x and 6x respectively. Deduct a separately assumed £20m present value of central costs. Net debt is 20; shares 20m.
- Equipment EV = 28 × 5 = 140; service EV = 16 × 6 = 96.
- Divisional EV sum = 236; after central costs = 236 − 20 = 216.
- Equity = 216 − 20 net debt = 196; value per share = 196/20 = £9.80.
- Using equipment 4.5–5.5x and service 5.5–6.5x with the same deductions gives £8.70–£10.90 per share.
The £20m central-cost deduction and £20m net-debt deduction are different items that happen to have the same amount. The estimate does not include actual separation proceeds or costs.
Put it into practice
1. Reconcile the earnings
Why is 28+16 not Harbour’s consolidated EBITDA of 42?
Record your response in your workbook before opening feedback.
Compare with a model response
The divisions total 44 before central expense of 2. Comparable definitions and treatment of central costs must be explicit.
2. Test a breakup proposal
An adviser cites £9.80 SOTP versus £8 price as proof separation will create £1.80 per share. Give four questions.
Record your response in your workbook before opening feedback.
Compare with a model response
Are multiples achievable? What are transaction/tax costs? Which synergies are lost? How will debt and central costs be allocated or removed? Compare after-cost value and ongoing strategy.
3. Explain the two deductions
A classmate removes net debt but ignores central costs. Quantify the error under the stated model.
Record your response in your workbook before opening feedback.
Compare with a model response
Omitting the central-cost value overstates equity by £20m, or £1 per share. Net debt is a separate claim adjustment and does not compensate for that omission.
Jargon buster
SOTP
Sum-of-the-parts valuation with appropriate group adjustments.
Division
An operating component analysed separately.
Central costs
Group-level expenses not allocated within the stated division measures.
Synergy
An economic benefit of combined operations.
Dis-synergy
A lost benefit or extra cost from changing integration.
Conglomerate discount
A described gap versus an estimated parts value, requiring explanation.
Knowledge check
Make each choice on the page. Feedback explains the reasoning. Use Try again after revisiting an idea.
AQA connection and further reading
AQA 7138 connections: 3.1.4 financial management, 3.3.3 strategy/investment appraisal, 3.3.4 change and uncertainty; Annex 6 quantitative interpretation; AO2–AO4 application, analysis and evaluation. Enterprise DCF, WACC, trading multiples and SOTP are investing enrichment, not prescribed AQA company-valuation methods.
AQA 7138 specification
Primary curriculum mapping; teacher interpretation, not endorsement.
IAS 7 overview · IFRS Foundation
Accounting classification context. Presentation changes and effective/adoption dates must be checked for real reports.
Free Cash Flow Valuation · CFA Institute
Technical cross-check for consistent claims and valuation formulas; advanced optional reading.
Introduction to Valuation · Aswath Damodaran, NYU
Optional deeper reading on valuation approaches.
Take forward
Value distinct operations and reconcile consolidated earnings. Adjust for central costs and other claims. Separate segment valuation from a claim that breakup creates value.