1.2.11 · 60–90 minutes; can be split across club sessions
What you will learn
- Translate an owner’s objectives and constraints into an explicit allocation and liquidity check.
- Calculate scenario effects on the learner’s own recorded weights.
- Conduct manager diligence and communicate a balanced, revisable board decision.
1.2 · Asset Classes
Asset Classes

Asset Classes · the work you will do
- 1Identify the claim
- 2Explain the return
- 3Test risks and access
- 4Check the mandate
Before you begin
You have responsibility for a fictional educational endowment. It has a long life but must pay grants and capital calls this year. Before choosing assets, write the difference between a long investment horizon and the ability to wait for every investment to become liquid.
Write an initial answer before continuing.
Video coming soon · about 6 minutes
The Asset Owner Challenge
Use the narration below while the recording is being made, then try the decisions in this lesson.
Read the full narration
Welcome to On Judgement. You have responsibility for a fictional educational endowment. It has a long life but must pay grants and capital calls this year. Before choosing assets, write the difference between a long investment horizon and the ability to wait for every investment to become liquid. Take a first view. You can change it when you have considered the evidence.
Harbour Learning Endowment has£10m. It must pay£600,000 at the end of the coming year. An existing private-fund investment will call£300,000; another£200,000 is possible in stress. Total uncalled commitments are£500,000. The policy’s specified illiquid bucket may not exceed35% of starting invested value, venture may not exceed10%, and hedge funds may not exceed10%. These are teaching rules, not a recommended allocation for any real institution. The starting weights are35%public equities,30%fixed income,5%private equity,5%direct property,5%commodities,5%private infrastructure and15%money markets. Venture, private credit and hedge funds start atzero. All ten buckets must remain visible even when their weight iszero. Record an initial proposal and its reasons before revealing a scenario result.
A grant payment leaves the endowment. A capital call converts cash into an additional investment under the simplified assumption that it is initially worth the amount called. Do not subtract both as losses of NAV. Calls still reduce cash available for grants and other obligations. The remaining unfunded commitment must continue to be tracked. For the scenario exercise, money markets are the only bucket assumed available for scheduled payments without a sale of another asset. This is deliberately conservative bookkeeping for a defined exercise, not a claim that listed shares or bonds can never be sold. If cash is insufficient, record the shortfall and propose a financing or sale decision with its costs and risks; do not silently assume free liquidity.
The one-year growth scenario returns, in bucket order, are: public equities15%,fixed income3%,private equity18%,property8%,commodities−5%,venture25%,private credit7%,infrastructure9%,hedge funds6%,money markets3.5%. The inflation-stress returns are: −15%,−12%,−20%,−8%,15%,−30%,−10%,−5%,−7%,2.5%. These are invented teaching inputs. They are not forecasts, historical facts or promises. Multiply each starting weight by its scenario return, then add the contributions. Apply the weighted return to£10m and deduct the£600,000 grant. Calls are assumed to occur after investment returns, moving cash into private equity at equal initial value. For cash, apply the money-market return to the starting cash bucket, then deduct the grant and relevant calls. The interactive companion retains the entered weights rather than replacing them with a preset portfolio.
Use five diligence stages: strategy and competitive advantage; underlying risks and leverage; liquidity and capital calls; fees and governance/conflicts; sustainability objectives and evidence. Ask for relevant documents, definitions and stress results. A confident answer without supporting evidence is not sufficient. A target return is not an agreed outcome. For a private infrastructure proposal, investigate contractual revenues, construction exposure, counterparty strength, debt, maintenance funding, call notice periods, extensions and transfer restrictions. Read the management fee basis, carried-interest waterfall and conflict procedures. Record unanswered questions and who should resolve them. A good interview can end with a decision to investigate further.
A trustee may compare the endowment with an all-equity benchmark after shares rise. Acknowledge the performance difference, then explain the mandate, policy benchmark, spending and risks on a consistent basis. Diversification is not an excuse for every poor decision; identify what the original reasoning got right or missed. When discussing sustainability, specify the mechanism and a measure—for example building energy use with capital cost and whole-life impacts—rather than promise that every sustainable label improves returns. Finish with a board note recording the allocation, assumptions, countercase, liquidity check and a trigger for review. Judge the quality of reasoning separately from which invented scenario happens to favour the chosen weights.
Let's work through Starting allocation under inflation stress. Use the starting weights and the inflation-stress assumptions. Include the scheduled£300,000 capital call but not the additional stress call in the first calculation. Pause here and try the calculation or reasoning before continuing.
Weighted return =35%×(−15%)+30%×(−12%)+5%×(−20%)+5%×(−8%)+5%×15%+5%×(−5%)+15%×2.5% =−9.375%. Portfolio before grant =£10m×0.90625=£9,062,500. After£600,000 grant, NAV=£8,462,500. Money markets before payments =£1.5m×1.025=£1,537,500. After grant and£300,000 call, cash=£637,500. If the additional£200,000 call occurs, cash=£437,500. The assumed call transfer does not itself change total NAV; remaining unfunded commitment then falls tozero.
The defined stress scenario produces a loss; it is not a score for investment skill. If only£300,000 is called,£200,000 remains uncalled. Do not confuse that remaining obligation with additional cash already invested.
Now try the choices in this lesson. If your answer changes, identify the reason. Conduct manager diligence and communicate a balanced, revisable board decision. Use the case activities to put the idea into your own words, and return to the evidence when more than one conclusion is defensible.
Read the complete mandate before acting
Harbour Learning Endowment has£10m. It must pay£600,000 at the end of the coming year. An existing private-fund investment will call£300,000; another£200,000 is possible in stress. Total uncalled commitments are£500,000. The policy’s specified illiquid bucket may not exceed35% of starting invested value, venture may not exceed10%, and hedge funds may not exceed10%. These are teaching rules, not a recommended allocation for any real institution.
The starting weights are35%public equities,30%fixed income,5%private equity,5%direct property,5%commodities,5%private infrastructure and15%money markets. Venture, private credit and hedge funds start atzero. All ten buckets must remain visible even when their weight iszero. Record an initial proposal and its reasons before revealing a scenario result.
Keep obligations separate from investment returns
A grant payment leaves the endowment. A capital call converts cash into an additional investment under the simplified assumption that it is initially worth the amount called. Do not subtract both as losses of NAV. Calls still reduce cash available for grants and other obligations. The remaining unfunded commitment must continue to be tracked.
For the scenario exercise, money markets are the only bucket assumed available for scheduled payments without a sale of another asset. This is deliberately conservative bookkeeping for a defined exercise, not a claim that listed shares or bonds can never be sold. If cash is insufficient, record the shortfall and propose a financing or sale decision with its costs and risks; do not silently assume free liquidity.
Use explicit scenarios, not invented success
The one-year growth scenario returns, in bucket order, are: public equities15%, fixed income3%, private equity18%, property8%, commodities−5%, venture25%, private credit7%, infrastructure9%, hedge funds6%, money markets3.5%. The inflation-stress returns are: −15%,−12%,−20%,−8%,15%,−30%,−10%,−5%,−7%,2.5%. These are invented teaching inputs. They are not forecasts, historical facts or promises.
Multiply each starting weight by its scenario return, then add the contributions. Apply the weighted return to£10m and deduct the£600,000 grant. Calls are assumed to occur after investment returns, moving cash into private equity at equal initial value. For cash, apply the money-market return to the starting cash bucket, then deduct the grant and relevant calls. The interactive companion retains the entered weights rather than replacing them with a preset portfolio.
Ask a manager what could go wrong
Use five diligence stages: strategy and competitive advantage; underlying risks and leverage; liquidity and capital calls; fees and governance/conflicts; sustainability objectives and evidence. Ask for relevant documents, definitions and stress results. A confident answer without supporting evidence is not sufficient. A target return is not an agreed outcome.
For a private infrastructure proposal, investigate contractual revenues, construction exposure, counterparty strength, debt, maintenance funding, call notice periods, extensions and transfer restrictions. Read the management fee basis, carried-interest waterfall and conflict procedures. Record unanswered questions and who should resolve them. A good interview can end with a decision to investigate further.
Explain and review the decision
A trustee may compare the endowment with an all-equity benchmark after shares rise. Acknowledge the performance difference, then explain the mandate, policy benchmark, spending and risks on a consistent basis. Diversification is not an excuse for every poor decision; identify what the original reasoning got right or missed.
When discussing sustainability, specify the mechanism and a measure—for example building energy use with capital cost and whole-life impacts—rather than promise that every sustainable label improves returns. Finish with a board note recording the allocation, assumptions, countercase, liquidity check and a trigger for review. Judge the quality of reasoning separately from which invented scenario happens to favour the chosen weights.
Starting allocation under inflation stress
Use the starting weights and the inflation-stress assumptions. Include the scheduled£300,000 capital call but not the additional stress call in the first calculation.
- Weighted return =35%×(−15%)+30%×(−12%)+5%×(−20%)+5%×(−8%)+5%×15%+5%×(−5%)+15%×2.5% =−9.375%.
- Portfolio before grant =£10m×0.90625=£9,062,500. After£600,000 grant, NAV=£8,462,500.
- Money markets before payments =£1.5m×1.025=£1,537,500. After grant and£300,000 call, cash=£637,500.
- If the additional£200,000 call occurs, cash=£437,500. The assumed call transfer does not itself change total NAV; remaining unfunded commitment then falls tozero.
The defined stress scenario produces a loss; it is not a score for investment skill. If only£300,000 is called,£200,000 remains uncalled. Do not confuse that remaining obligation with additional cash already invested.
Put it into practice
1. Build and test your allocation
Enter or write ten weights totalling100%. Check the35%illiquid,10%venture and10%hedge-fund limits before running either scenario. Save the allocation and a short reason. Calculate both scenarios and compare cash, NAV after the grant and policy limits. The interactive local companion retains your weights; the native lesson can be completed with the printed table.
Record your response in your workbook before opening feedback.
Compare with a model response
A strong record preserves the original weights and reasons. The starting allocation is a valid reference, not the single right answer. If a proposal breaches a stated limit, revise it or explicitly seek a policy change before approval. Show a cash shortfall honestly. The fictional scenarios do not establish a best real portfolio.
2. Manager and trustee roleplays
First run the five-stage manager interview described above, recording an evidence request at every stage. Then hold a three-stage trustee review: acknowledge a benchmark comparison, explain the mandate and risks, and agree a documented next step. Swap interviewer roles.
Record your response in your workbook before opening feedback.
Compare with a model response
Diligence covers strategy, risk, liquidity, fees/governance and sustainability with supporting evidence. The trustee review uses a relevant policy benchmark and spending context; it does not promise a recovery or chase the previous winner automatically. Record a decision, responsibility and review date. Teacher rubric: five manager evidence requests plus clear, balanced trustee communication.
3. Sustainability committee and final paper
Discuss four stages: the owner’s objective; two possible asset-level mechanisms; evidence and trade-offs; monitoring and revision. Then write the300–450word board paper specified in the final case. Include your initial and final allocations rather than overwrite your first decision.
Record your response in your workbook before opening feedback.
Compare with a model response
For example compare a property retrofit with a project financing proposal, specifying cost, outcome, counterparty and measurement. Explain effects on liquidity and concentration. Preserve uncertainty and the opposing case. Assessment concerns mandate fit, calculation, evidence and a defensible conclusion, not the highest simulated return.
Jargon buster
Policy allocation
An agreed portfolio structure or range under the mandate.
Liquidity budget
Resources and limits used to plan cash access and obligations.
Unfunded commitment
Committed capital not yet called or otherwise funded.
Policy benchmark
A comparison reflecting the agreed portfolio policy.
Stress scenario
A hypothetical set of adverse assumptions for analysis.
Weighted contribution
Portfolio weight multiplied by the relevant asset return.
Rebalancing
Changing holdings towards a specified policy or revised allocation.
Due diligence
Structured investigation before a decision.
Decision journal
A dated record of reasoning before the outcome is known.
Review trigger
A specified observation or change prompting reconsideration.
Knowledge check
Make each choice on the page. Feedback explains the reasoning. Use Try again after revisiting an idea.
What to take forward
Start with the mandate, retain your decision, reconcile cash and value, then test and explain the outcome. A thoughtful revision is part of investing.
AQA connection and further sources
7138 3.1.4 finance; 3.3.1 stakeholders; 3.3.3 strategic choices; 3.3.4 uncertainty; 4.2 AO1–AO4; Annex 6–7 numerical interpretation. Multi-asset allocation is applied enrichment.
These are interpretive links, not AQA endorsement. Asset-class and fund mechanics include enrichment beyond the specification.
- Saved GAIN reference GAIN-1.2.11
- Investor.gov: asset allocation and diversification
- AQA 7138 specification